Legal News for Credit Union Managers Since 1990
« “Note” Created Personal Liabilty On Business Debt
Nondischargeable Debt: Pre-Approved Credit Card Debt »
16
Apr
2019

Automatic Wage Deposit Garnishment

In some states such as Texas, a debtor’s wages are generally not subject to garnishment. Here, however, this Texas debtor’s wages were directly deposited into the debtor’s account at I.B.M. Employees Southwest Federal Credit Union. 
 
A judgment creditor thereafter garnished debtor’s account at the credit union and debtor brought an action to dissolve the garnishment, arguing that the funds in the account were his wages and, therefore, exempt under Texas law from attachment.

The court held that the debtor’s automatic deposit of his wages into his credit union account are subject to garnishment by another creditor since the deposit itself changes the character of the protected wages.

The court held that once wages are paid and received by the wage-earner, whether paid directly or deposited into the debtor’s account, they cease to be protected and are subject to garnishment.  Gerald Guiberson v. I.B.M. Employees Southwest Federal Credit Union (Texas Court of Appeals, Case No. 92-03011-CV).

EDITOR’S COMMENT

It is important to note that although a debtor’s wages will not be protected from garnishment once they are deposited into a financial institution’s account, other benefits, such as ADC, Veterans or Social Security benefits, have been extended protection against garnishment.

In the Michigan case of Jerry Edwards v. Patricia Henry (97 Mich. App. 173), the plaintiff garnished debtor’s bank account which was, in part, comprised of a deposit of the debtor’s ADC benefits.

The garnished account also contained wages from the debtor’s part-time job. This court found that the wages in the account were subject to garnishment, however, the plaintiff was not permitted to attach the ADC benefits in debtor’s account. The court noted that the federal statutes provide greater protection on government issued benefits.

Depending on the precise government benefit issued, the debtor’s account may be protected from garnishment even after it is deposited in debtor’s account. For example, the statute protecting Veterans benefits provides shelter “either before or after receipt by the beneficiary.”

Author: Charles R. Harroun, Attorney at Law



This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 at 4:32 am and is filed under Employees, National. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

  • Recently Posted Articles written by: Charels R. Harroun, Attorney at Law

    • Parents Liable: Minor Forged Check
    • Voluntary Payments: Automatic Stay Violation
    • Preferential Transfer: Checks
    • Credit Union Liability: Failure to Payoff Lien
    • Truth in Lending Violation: Collateral Not Identified
    • Michigan Supreme Court: Secured Loan Loss Payable Clause
    • Bank Employee Steals $100,000 of Checks
    • Discharge Denied: Joint Ownership of Assets
    • Nondischargeable Cash Advances
    • Debt Cancellation Insurance
    • Nondischargeable Debt: False Financial Statement

  • Website Builder

2009-2017 Copyright Harroun, P.C. | Credit Union Legal Newsletter powered by WordPress and Uchilla
Subscribe: Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)