Legal News for Credit Union Managers Since 1990
« Nondischargeable Credit Card Debt
Wrongful Discharge: Credit Union Employee »
22
Jul
2020

Collection Letter Not Required Before Filing Suit

The Sixth Circuit Court has ruled that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) does not require an attorney to send a collection letter to the borrowers before a creditor files suit against the borrower(s).
 
In this case, the creditor’s attorney did not send a demand letter to the debtor prior to filing suit.

Here, the Sixth Circuit additionally ruled that an attorney cannot be liable for a clerical error in a complaint filed against a debtor.

The creditor’s attorney misstated the balance owing to the creditor in the complaint and debtor filed an answer to the complaint alleging the balance owing was incorrect.

The parties settled their differences and, thereafter, debtor filed an action in Federal Court against creditor’s attorney, alleging violations of the FDCPA.

Creditor’s counsel filed a motion for summary judgment and the Federal Court dismissed debtor’s complaint, finding no violation of the FDCPA.

Debtor appealed the dismissal of his action against creditor’s attorney. On appeal, the court noted that the Act does apply to collection attorneys, but found that to accept debtor’s rationale would prevent attorneys from engaging in the regular practice of law to collect debts.

Debtor argued that since Scott v. Jones, 964 F.2d 314, held that an attorney who files a collection action in the wrong venue violates the Act, that a misrepresentation of the amount owing in the complaint also violates the act.

The Act provides that any collection action be brought either in the judicial district in which the consumer signed the contract or in which the consumer resides.

The appellate court found that the Act applies to attorneys when they are collecting debts, and not when they are performing tasks of a legal nature, such as filing a complaint against the debtor. An application of the Act, as debtor argues, would prevent attorneys from engaging in the practice of law.

The court ruling affirmed a dismissal of debtor’s complaint against creditor’s attorney and found no violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Green v. Hocking, No. 92-1794.

However, this court held that the Act does not apply to an attorney who simply files a complaint against a debtor to collect a debt.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act [FDCPA] applies to collection attorneys and “debt collectors”.  It imposes technical requirements concerning “communications” made in the course of collecting a debt. Several courts have held that the Act applies to attorneys who send “demand letters” to debtors.

Author: Charles R. Harroun, Attorney at Law



This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 22nd, 2020 at 4:34 am and is filed under National, Secured Loans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

  • Recently Posted Articles written by: Charels R. Harroun, Attorney at Law

    • Excess Income & Bad Faith Bankruptcy Filing
    • Nondischargeable Loans to Bank Employee
    • Employee Discrimination: Failure to Promote
    • Defective Notary: Mortgage Void
    • Debtor’s Irresponsible Debts Discharged
    • Credit Union Employee – Sex Discrimination
    • CUSO Employee Contracts Enforced
    • Bankruptcy: No Tolling Statute of Limitations On Co-Maker
    • Student Loan: Preferential Status Denied
    • Discharged Loan Re-Written Is Unenforceable
    • Nonischargeable Cash Advances

  • Website Builder

2009-2020 Copyright Harroun, P.C. | Credit Union Legal Newsletter powered by WordPress and Uchilla
Subscribe: Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)